//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
I like this a lot … feels so uncomplicated … expanding the brackets (in this situation) just feels overkill. #UKMathsChat
This 'revaluing' approach (Hackenberg calls it 'transformation') is taught at Primary … e.g. 53−19=54−20 ... but I've never seen it applied to Secondary algebra ... but if it was, things like 20−(13−2x)=15 then become possible with number knowledge rather than brackets knowledge. Hmm?! 3/3
Piecing together thought processes for 9th century algebra … in the absence of a) symbolic algebra and b) negative numbers: now: simplify 14 − (10 − x) then: simplify [14] less [10 less x] minuend: [14] subtrahend: [10 less x] • goal: ... 1/3 #UKMathsChat #iTeachMath #historyofmaths