//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
doing the Lord's work here 🫡
I made a Firefox add-on that lets you find the federal court opinion/docket mentioned in a news story in one click. Using @free.law's CourtListener and RECAP of course. addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo... (this is a personal project)
laying off 10% of your work force amidst a shift to "AI writes the code that humans then have to review" has some interesting effects, anyway
anyway, the more important question than "did you ship the orphan-crushing feature on purpose or accidentally" is "why did you have an internal orphan-crushing feature at all" (as well as "...especially when you are still under an FTC consent decree concerning your treatment of orphans")
In my mind is a Family Feud board with options like "Shipped on purpose hoping we wouldn't notice," "Shipped on purpose bc some engineer wanted data for testing; no coworkers spotted it," "Got included truly by error but nobody noticed," etc. Anyway how's that FTC privacy compliance program going
NEW: Days after WIRED revealed that Meta had embedded an unreleased facial-recognition system in software distributed to more than 50 million users, the company appears to have removed it. www.wired.com/story/meta-r...
honestly this is nuts, they're establishing an 8-hour security perimeter around the most used transportation hub in North America, so one guy can attend a basketball game