//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
this ban will teach students important skills like digital privacy and censorship evasion
"Articles that portrayed screen time as harmful spread much faster than those with balanced or mixed findings. Once a study was picked up by major outlets, it was repeated again and again. Fear-based narratives can encourage rapid action without a full understanding of the evidence."
My response to recent smartphone-causing-fertility-decline papers is that researchers are using instrumental variables as a a substitute for theory and logic and this is incorrect.
Have no particular view on the smartphone hypothesis, but do think people could look one inch beyond their noses before extrapolating from their own complaints to a global trend that people have been researching for decades.
It shouldn’t be controversial to say that the creation of a “trillionaire” represents a giant and complete failure of public policy and government.
1d
5h
4h
5h
1d
Remember, folks, post-hoc speculation as to why you didn't get p<0.05 is still just post-hoc speculation even if (like me) you would personally like to believe that the effect is real.
2d