Political technologist, bringing democracy to the internet. Brussels, πͺπΊ.
β’ tech, governance, science, politics, philosophy, infrastructure, cats, terrible puns
β’ https://berjon.com/
β’ ex W3C, NYT, ScienceAI, Protocol Labs
β’ he/him/Ishmael
β’ Signal robin.77
Robin Berjon
Loading...
Once you see it, you can't unsee it
Versailles.
This is why you need historians.
20,000 on Eurosky and growing!
Switch to @eurosky.social, try out @mu.social β the future of social is coming and we're barely getting started.
one anecdote: I was searching for a link to one of my old papers on Google, and the automated Gemini summary attributed all of my lab's work to my husband
Robin's been belting out bangers, this one got some real good lines
Excellent work by Robin as usual. @quillmatiq.com now I must request a setting for Disperse that requires a note with every link clipping.
The establishment always wants its own internet. Different politics, identical structure: wealthy insiders, community infrastructure they didn't build, and openness performed just long enough to matter.
Imagine antitrust law weren't totally disfunctional...
I tried to explain to myself the behaviour of some people who only seem to reheat one another's ideas β and are the same people still on X today, irrespective of political alignment.
berjon.com/rt/
If this isn't endorsing a private product, as @thomasregnier.ec.europa.eu claims, why do we have President von der Leyen posting a branded influencer tease video?
This was always the risk for tech sovereignty: that it would die from cronyism.
www.linkedin.com/posts/rentzh...
B. Prendergast
John Bull
Robin Berjon
sΕm
Tynan Purdy β
Coleen Murphy
I have often found myself confounded by the behaviour of some people who seem impervious to reality β like the people still on X today. Here, I try to understand what grounds their epistemology and it...
I tried to explain to myself the behaviour of some people who only seem to reheat one another's ideas β and are the same people still on X today, irrespective of political alignment.
berjon.com/rt/
When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute womenβs work to hallucinated male scholars.
