Millions of copyrighted songs were fed to AI music generators - now there's proof
Suno and rivals are being sued for $150k per song. A sum that would bankrupt these companies and set an important precedent.
it me
Evergreen post.
This album of 90s Weather Channel inspired music from @everydaylouie.bsky.social is sublime
louiezong.bandcamp.com/album/strang...
llms can't output "writing" that's genuinely readable, even about technical stuff, even when it has 100% human-generated context fed to it
there's an emptiness to it. it feels both hollow and slippery. it lacks direction. you can't find purchase; the mind wanders
it feels like having a concussion
i really wonder how people got this so twisted.
you distrust the wealthy and powerful when they're being pro-social and saying "the right things."
not when they're being venal, self-centered, aggressive, hateful and evil.
oops i meant to quote this post, not the one above
but everyone who is tempted to use "ai" to "write" ought to know that it's not specific words or em dashes that gives them away
it's the utter illegibility of it
individual sentences may be ok in isolation but in bulk, we can always tell
Millions of copyrighted songs trained AI music generators, and new searchable databases from The Atlantic now confirm which tracks were used.
please do the one about the park ranger who finds staircases in the woods
Amy Hoy
I'm attending a digital humanities event in Montreal. There was a keynote on AI and something about the talk made me wonder if it had been written by Claude. I said as much in the Q&A. As I posed the question, the speaker shifted, looking slightly uncomfortable. What he said next shocked the room +
