i love the small print “because the regulators won’t let us :(“
That's not what j pilled means, NYT. It's a deeply antisemitic term that means someone is awakened to antisemitic beliefs that Jews secretly run the government and they must be removed from the United States.
The NYT is laundering white supremacist terms.
My "We don't allow bets on assassinations and murder" ad campaign has people asking a lot of questions already answered by the ad campaign
NYT: young people at CPAC are "J-pilled," defined as slang for "skepticism of Israeli influence"
Then a few grafs later they quote a groyper who says "at least 60 percent of the young people here" are fans of Nick Fuentes, who wants to deport all Jews from America www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/s...
Molly White
Alejandra Caraballo
David Dayen
Madeline Peltz
Google Gemini - still shitty
The singular "they" has been around longer than English has had codified grammar, so really, anyone who fumes about it can go fuck themself
www.oed.com/discover/a-b...
reactionaries infesting fanbases is really really annoying but you can mostly ignore it by deleting twitter
This perplexes me cos singular “they” has been used innocuously for years. I was watching an episode of The X-Files from 1993 where a character was consistently referred to as “they”; they were not explicitly non-binary, the script was just written that way.
