My hunch is that reviewers would look more for signals beyond the content (e.g., do they cite me well, reputation, connections with editor, etc.), make their mind up, and lead the AI review toward that decision.
Reminds me of the pistachio prices going through the roof with the arrival of Dubai chocolate thing.
Here is your head-to-head.
intheweights.com
"In the weights" means that a model is able to recall someone without using tools like web search.
Your strength score is an average of how strongly each model recognized you, plus a bonus for how many models recognized you.
Trillionaireness is meaningless just as the new year's eve or birthdays
OSF is operated nonprofit and overseen by scientists, no? I find some of the recent talk about it a bit off the tone. This one is witty, fine but, some others I have seen are a bit too harsh.
You have nothing to lose but the system prompts.
www.washingtonpost.com/technology/i...
Do journals reject more or fewer papers since reviewers started to use AI?
I prefer to be working while all others are on holiday (no requests, emails) over being on holiday while other are not (sending emails).