//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
COUNTERPOINT: Expanding and rebalancing the Court was fully justified by 2017 and needs no further justification but if it did Callais would do nicely. A single political party controlling the Court for 56 consecutive years even while losing 7 of 8 popular votes for president is reason enough.
6h
Jamison Foser
"Court-packing would create a slippery slope to the destruction of judicial review...To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering. There are also better remedies for various other shortcomings of the Court," writes @ilyasomin.bsky.social.
9h
To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering.
www.lawfaremedia.org
Why Callais Doesn’t Justify Court-Packing
Lawfare