I wrote a comparison of what might happen as we burn less stuff, and our adoption of incredibly powerful machines.
Tech that doesn't burn fuel is already cheaper, tech that makes new stories is so cheap it's hugely disruptive.
But is it good?
IKEA didn't build renewable generation to power 1.47 million homes because politicians told them to. They did it because the economics stacked up.
With much of the investment already paid off, savings of over half a billion USD per year on electricity costs, the fundamentals become hard to ignore.
It’s stopped raining and the sun has come out. How do I know? I just check my solar generation like a tragic energy nerd.
You know that Hegseth bloke?
The American with opinions about us and how we live and what we should do.
I mean, I'm a polite chap, I have no wish to offend, but mate. Fuck off.