This piece is another example of how evidentiary standards for covering young people basically don't exist. It's a take on the supposedly widespread and normal use of this language anchored around guesstimates from two (2) people about behavior at a single high school.
One boring thing in free speech discourse is the confusion between the right to speak once invited and the right to be invited to speak. Should Tommy Robinson have been prohibited from appearing at the Oxford Union (he wasn't)? Debatable. Should student edgelords have ever invited him? 100% no
Osita Nwanevu
The implication of this "New York Times" headline is that "goy" is simply a slang term used by Generation Z now, no longer attached to antisemitic implications. I think this is not only wrong, but rather dangerous for the newspaper to be printing.
“Why is everyone so angry” I ask, in year 18 of plummeting living standards, cancelled services and a crumbling public realm
Welp
It makes a farce out of the entire governing process. We don’t have a parliamentary system here; we have a Doug system.
My, that’s a lot of rain
I can’t decide whether Trump and his goons are deliberately wrecking the place before he goes or whether they just suck that bad at everything
Just wanted to point out that John Byrne’s Doom Patrol was abominable
And they could have done that but chose not to 🤷♂️
