//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
I find myself in a church. Why? Have I been put here for a reason? Is there a deeper purpose to my presence?
So my current theory is that from time immemorial CSS devs got used to content-based layouts such as tables, floats, and flexbox. Then grid came, and it's not based on the content of the items. That's why it's considered confusing or "I already use flexbox so I don't need grid." [1/2]
Praise be unto the cascade.
If this theory is true, grid-lanes should be picked up much more easily than grid, because grid-lanes are once more content-based. #cssday [2/2]