//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Thomas Sargent Professor of Economics at the University of Minnesota and consultant at the Minneapolis Fed. Views are my own. RT ≠ E. Web page: https://users.nber.org/~denardim/
Mariacristina De Nardi









Loading...
How expectations shape labor market decisions: Subjective Earnings and Employment Dynamics by Manuel Arellano, Orazio Attanasio, Margherita Borella, @mdenardi.bsky.social & Gonzalo Paz-Pardo www.rfberlin.com/wp-content/u...
Showing how to identify models of earnings and employment dynamics from subjective expectations data, from Manuel Arellano, Orazio Attanasio, Margherita Borella, @mdenardi.bsky.social, and Gonzalo Paz-Pardo www.nber.org/papers/w35027
Bottom line: high observed earnings persistence does not necessarily mean highly persistent of individual-level productivity shocks. A large part reflects heterogeneity and employer transitions.
Reduced-form estimates can overstate persistence and volatility because they load on job transitions and sorting. Once we account for heterogeneity, volatility falls sharply and becomes much flatter across the earnings distribution.
Main result: we find less persistence and less volatility in individual productivity shocks than much of the earlier literature suggests, but more heterogeneity in ability and match quality.