//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Well, now, that's interesting. You're saying rates for Georgia Power customers are going DOWN?!
In fact, the judge today called some of the State's proposals an "overreach."
Another truth Julia couldn’t be bothered to contemplate: Meta’s total Q1 revenue was up $55.9 billion or 33% year-over-year. I’m no finance guy, but that seems pretty good.
The truth is this demise story has been written time and again. And yet Meta continues to grow. Here’s another truth. Julia just skipped over why there was a small dip in total in DAU last quarter: outages in Iran and blocks in Russia. Inconvenient for her to have had to cite that.
An expert @theguardian.com quotes: the “idea that WhatsApp can selectively and retroactively access the content of [end-to-end encrypted] individual chats is a mathematical impossibility."
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story, eh, @jeffhorwitz.bsky.social!? The documents you cite in the story itself contradict this headline.
The headline says "Zuckerberg blocked curbs on sex-talking chatbots for minors" But the story cites a document that says "Zuckerberg believed that AI companions should be blocked from engaging in sexually 'explicit' conversations" w young people. Huh?!
After (checks historical record) over a dozen years worth of public criticism from Julia, this kind of gleefully reductive take from her is nothing new. But there is a word for it: projection.