2/ I'll leave the politics to people like Dean and my colleagues Fathom. Happy to be engaged, as ever, on the work Dean cites of mine on regulatory markets.
My colleagues at Fathom have a sharp new piece: independent verification has gone from a proposal to a live national debate. I've been working on this since 2017. This shift is real progress, but only the first step, and the harder question is what it should look like.
1/ Grateful for Dean Ball's sharp and balanced take on politics and AI governance, and the crazy situation we've landed in: increasingly urgent to get a smart regulatory framework for powerful AI, and yet basic rule of law and common sense are getting kicked to the curb. buff.ly/JfV0BiN
3/ A ten-year project to integrate technical innovation driven by markets with appropriate public and democratic choice about what we want from AI, what Dean calls deciding what's fair.
My new op-ed is out in the Washington Examiner. The Great American AI Act would have the most powerful AI models tested for catastrophic risk by independent, government-licensed verifiers, with the government, not the companies, setting the standard. buff.ly/G45GK0Q
Gillian Hadfield
Gillian Hadfield
Gillian Hadfield
Gillian Hadfield
Gillian Hadfield
A bipartisan federal discussion draft, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind are all converging around independent verification as a key element of AI governance.
