//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts







Loading...
Big takeaway #4: Populations show strong genetic structure + long-term isolation → widespread incipient speciation ➡️ Many “species” may contain multiple lineages ➡️ Conservation should treat populations as distinct units It was a big team effort—thanks to the many wonderful co-authors 🙌
Big takeaway #1: Adaptive radiation doesn’t always require lots of new, de-novo mutation. Despite large their phenotypic diversity, different species not strongly differentiated. Evolution repeatedly drew on overlapping genetic variation during Scalesia’s rapid diversification.
We have a new paper out on one of evolution’s “classic” systems: Galápagos Scalesia plants! 🌿 How do you generate huge differences in leaf shape across species in <1 million years? We combined genomics + morphology + transcriptomics across the full radiation 👇
Big takeaway #2: Same trait, different genes: leaf lobing evolved multiple times independently—but via different genes within the same developmental pathway. ➡️ Phenotypic convergence ➡️ Distinct genetic routes