It also occurred to me that the worked example in the piece ignores large CGT concessions for active small businesses, such as the 50% active asset reduction. These substantially reduce real world CGT.
The piece confounds more than it enlightens.
I get the appeal of a party like the Australian Democrats but without populist anti-establishment vibes & with other viable minor parties now existing, the constituency for a socially liberal centrist party is max 5% of voters
reading the employment services "reform" discussion paper... it's unclear what advantages outsourced providers are thought to bring. what *do* they do that wouldn't be better achieved by a body with the public interest as its primary goal?