Court holds Google liable for false claims in AI Overviews. Seems significant.
"A regular search engine just points to outside websites. But AI overviews generate 'independent, new, and substantive statements' by evaluating and combining content from various third-party sites" the-decoder
Allegedly the banned-for-life list from the soon to shutter Parkview Tavern.
the-decoder.com
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previous limited liability protections for search engine operators don't apply to AI overviews. In this case, Google's AI had falsely linked two publishers to fraud and made claims that didn't appear in any of the linked sources. The ruling could set a precedent for AI-generated content liability worldwide.
Unfortunately, I've been laid off as part of Paizo's recent restructuring (paizo.com/blog/paizo-r...). I'm reopening my public commissions while I look for what's next; if you've been looking for an excuse to get your TTRPG character illustrated, please reach out!
it's been years and i'm still always delighted whenever i look at A NOCTURNE and see its version (right) of Blades in the Dark's tables (left) for measuring Scale
it's been years and i'm still always delighted whenever i look at A NOCTURNE and see its version (right) of Blades in the Dark's tables (left) for measuring Scale
cozzymandias (Comms Open)
something incredibly funny about taking a game where you start out as a gaggle of Tier 0 nobodies and hacking it into one where you begin as Scale 7 immortals astride the stars
my one real complaint is that it only has six playbooks in total... but that honestly just has me considering whipping up one or two more! for a setting with both priests and witches, i'm shocked that neither have playable options.
they'd fit well in an upstart noble's retinue, right?
