//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts






Loading...
The media absolutely screwed Ben on this story. He’s a hero—the only business school professor I’ve ever known who even considered fighting for the little guy, let alone who actually did—and did not deserve the treatment he received.
Update in my lawsuit against Harvard: Judge ruled against me on all key points. FRB P&P is not a contract. I can’t prove H violated P&P. Any procedural violations didn't harm me bc Dean Nohria says he would not have recommended tenure regardless. My remarks: www.edelman-v-harvard.org/reflections-...
Andrew King posted an incisive series on LI: www.linkedin.com/feed/update/... www.linkedin.com/feed/update/... www.linkedin.com/feed/update/... www.linkedin.com/feed/update/... www.linkedin.com/feed/update/...
The HBS committee that evaluated me offered 13 negative quotes. Turns out just two witnesses contributed almost half these quotes (6/13). Two other quotes were falsified and are not found in interview notes. My new video critiques this sloppy work: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxRi...
3mo
3mo
4mo
3mo
Preformed conclusion. When chair Amy Edmondson received evidence that presented me favorably, she said she was "anxious". Called that subject "not the right one to pick"--meaning the "right" subject would be one that presented me negatively. Opposite of following the evidence.
Recurring problems: Selective excerpting. Remarks contrary to the witness's own words in a contemporaneous letter or in deposition. Speculation about contexts the witness did not observe. Confusion about key facts the witness criticized.
Many discussions on X including a closer look at the restaurateur who intentionally overcharged customers for years. Ex-partner says he hid income and drove a $279k SUV, while I cycled. Who's the bully? And tragedy: He offered drugs to a date, who declined. She was dead, overdose, the next morning.
4mo
4mo
3mo
Ben Edelman
Ben Edelman
Ben Edelman
Ben Edelman
Ben Edelman
Ben Edelman
Aaron Greenspan
Many discussions on X including a closer look at the restaurateur who intentionally overcharged customers for years. Ex-partner says he hid income and drove a $279k SUV, while I cycled. Who's the bully? And tragedy: He offered drugs to a date, who declined. She was dead, overdose, the next morning.
3mo
Ben Edelman