Twas the night before SCOTUS opinions and all through the house, not a creature was stirring, not even Sam Alito's spouse. Election law nerds were still wrapped up in bed, nothing that could happen the next day would stop them seeing red.
I'm late to this, but I really did not like Alito's questioning in Chatrie v US at all. His point about it being advisory was not illuminating, it didn't help get to the heart of the case and it looked bad in light of Vullo. The question about where's the outrage was strange too.
Yeah very true. The US has had to put with Christian nationalism for far too long. See the below example, whoever that guy was who said this should clearly have been condemned in the strongest terms!
Roberts Court precedent that says that if States give out school vouchers they cannot exclude religious schools from that program or if they put rubber in playgrounds they can’t automatically excluded religious institutions has been labelled as Christian nationalist.
Mustn't have looked very hard.
What will happen at 10am US ET I cannot say, perhaps if Landor comes out the way I think it will, I will join in the progressive frenzied fray. But otherwise, I say to all sit tight, and have yourselves a lovely SCOTUS opinion night.
Of course, couched in language that was utmost clear as to the precise things being referred to.
Also the idea that political scientists in the American academy in particular are these apolitical actors that will just provide us with a pristine descriptive definition, and not try to steal bases by wrapping in their personal biases is genuinely hilarious.
