//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
@[email protected]. Displaced Philly boy. Executive Director of @ifin-intel.org. Threat hunter. Educator. Dad. General in the AI Resistance. taggartinstitute.org wtfbins.wtf linktr.ee/mttaggart
Taggart









Loading...
I guess Anthropic wanted to avoid the 1-2 punch of losing Fable *and* getting the customer outrage of usage-based billing like Copilot 🙃
I've resisted the analogy of asbestos as it sounds too simple. But I do think that as long as the technology is available, you're going to uncover generative AI in all sorts of processes that should have nothing to do with it.
Trying to imagine a situation where I more wanted everyone involved to lose. Nothing's coming to mind. Like holy government overreach, Batman. But also "There's no way to build a real defense soooo" is not the best argument.
Imagine giving all your secrets to an assistant and *expecting* them to get phished. That's what this is.