//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
OrthoFinder is not only fast and accurate, it's easy to use Just provide the complete set of amino acid sequences for your species If you prefer a specific tree or alignment tool, it's easy to customise We also provide rich outputs like gene duplications and comparative genomics stats
But is it still accurate? We benchmarked orthogroups using the OrthoBench dataset OrthoFinder came out on top
What about ortholog accuracy? We tested using the gold standard Quest for Orthologs benchmarking service OrthoFinder scored highly across the board
is there a version of the @official-smbe.bsky.social programme that is just a simple PDF? I struggle with these interactive agenda sites
Get OrthoFinder here github.com/OrthoFinder/... Read the paper here www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Our trick: run OrthoFinder on a small subset of species first Next, we sample representative sequences from each orthogroup to build profiles Genes from new species are then matched to these profiles to assign them to orthogroups We avoid the costly all-vs-all step that kills scalability