Then point to a specific thing she said as contrary to a preservation focused agenda.
Do you know how hard it is to find a good flowy shirt these days?
The thing about these clout chasing accounts is that they really don't believe in anything. They'll scare up any amount of engagement because their real purpose is to flood the zone with BS when it's time to influence an election.
Don't fall for it.
Interesting. I'm a Beta Ray Bill guys, myself
Does your back hurt from all that shifting goalposts?
It's truly just the PERFECT way to end this absolutely bonkers movie. Like, what more can you really add?
If you build a billion dollar data center and drain the local aquifer past the point of replenishment to maintain operations, your data center runs the risk of being inoperable in a very short amount of time. It is terrible for the environment and it's stupid business. That's what's being said here
There is a cost on the environment to essentially any labor humans do to continue their existence. The argument made here is that businesses and economists have not factored the full impact of their work on the environment, and should try to account for the harm done as they plan enterprise.
How much will you pay for a lung full of air?
Lindsay Hooper, CEO of the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, declared that water, soil and oxygen should not be "infinitely accessible" to the public. She called them "natural capital" that global elites must put on "the balance sheet."