//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
The paradox of integration: 3rd-gen Muslims are highly integrated, but report a stronger Muslim identity & higher perceived discrimination. Because they expect equal treatment and interact more with the broader public, they are more aware of and sensitive to exclusion.
We also asked an open-ended Q: "What does Germany mean to you?" Exposure to hate crimes or far-right rhetoric sparked terms like "racism". But importantly, it also invoked "justice," "freedom," & "tolerance." Exclusion can intensify appeals to democratic ideals for protection.
The Puzzle: Third-generation Muslims in Germany are the most socially, economically, and linguistically integrated. Yet, they are more likely to vote for left-wing parties than 1st and 2nd-generation Muslims. Why doesn't integration reduce group-based voting?
Exposure to hate-crime cues increased support for the center-left SPD from 19.9% (control) to 33.4%. These exclusionary cues sparked negative emotions like anger, which drove political mobilization rather than withdrawal.
To find out, we ran a survey experiment with ~1,000 Muslim Turks in Germany. We randomized exposure to news clips showing anti-Muslim hate crimes & far-right AfD rhetoric. The result? Both treatments increased political participation AND shifted votes to the left.
First, the big picture: Across 18 Western European democracies (2002–2020), there is a massive, persistent voting gap. Muslims support left-wing parties at much higher rates than non-Muslims, often by >30 points. This gap spikes when the far-right enters parliament.
Excellent op-ed on nonviolent protest from @robbwiller.bsky.social and @owasow.bsky.social on the importance of nonviolence here www.nytimes.com/2025/06/17/o.... Some additional points worth noting:
The takeaway: Integration and discrimination coexist. Rather than weakening political cohesion, exclusion reinforces collective political behavior. Integrated minorities rally behind parties perceived as protective of their rights. Read the full paper here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
2d
2d
2d
2d
2d
2d
11mo
2d
More women in radical-right parties doesn't mean progress—it means more conservatism. Our new study in ‪@eupthejournal.bsky.social‬ shows how female visibility is used to legitimize illiberal gender agendas, not challenge them. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
🚨 New paper! Does social integration change how minorities vote? Classic theories say yes: voting patterns should converge with the majority. But looking at Muslim Turks in Germany, we found the exact opposite. A thread on the integration puzzle 👇