//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
I'm scared embracing this glonzo issue is going to lead to further nimbyism in the future for actual good things. Future nimbys are cutting their teeth on this stuff
So you'd be fine with data centers being in industrial areas?
Water usage concerns are exaggerated for most regional locations. Electricity usage is the real concern. I'm scared embracing this glonzo issue is going to lead to further nimbyism in the future for actual good things. Future nimbys are cutting their teeth on this stuff
They literally discuss how the solution was a simple software fix to the inverters. Not that we shouldn't build data centers or anything
considering the weather and available water, wouldn't Michigan actually be a good location for data centers?
Are those plants the ones being put in urban areas?
I would simply not act buddy buddy with colleagues who have shown to be fine with the president wanting political violence on my party.