//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
@npp-journal.bsky.social
So what does this all mean? We think metabolic ill-health is accompanied by a cognitive shift towards energy conservation, a recalibration of the brain's willingness to expend effort for reward. This may be one pathway through which poor metabolic health contributes to psychiatric comorbidity.
This wasn't just a categorical difference between groups - metabolic health appears to scale *dimensionally* with effort-based decision-making. Across the full sample, metabolic risk continuously predicted motivational bias. Worse metabolic health = lower willingness to exert effort for reward.
We found clear group differences: participants with diabetes currently on semaglutide showed the lowest motivational acceptance bias, followed by those with diabetes off semaglutide, and controls with elevated metabolic risk; those with a low metabolic risk had the highest motivational bias.