//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
lol shut up
15h
2d
cait (and adonis)
sky ✨🔴✨
The internet was way better than it is now when there was *more* anonymity. The problem isn't that - it's social media, and specifically, the hyper-algorithmic social media of the mid2010s through now. I refuse to give up load-bearing parts of internet culture so these vultures can keep ruining us.
2d
ok I'm flagging in energy so I'm deploying weapons-grade motivation music music.youtube.com/watch?v=lU_9...
2d
Ah so LLMs operate like senior male academics. Who could have envisioned that technology trained on existing texts could operate in a fundamentally conservative nature
DINOSAURS ARE COOL TRANSPHOBIA IS NOT
I don't know if it's inflationary necessarily but I do remember this one from the case book in developmental econ.
2d
3d
me: didn't Laswell produce this? me: *clicks, hears first notes* me: yep
Seeing the Peter Serafinowicz Harry Potter announcement just made me think, once again, about this excellent James Acaster bit from Off Menu.
1d
1d
3d
1d
Video
When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.