We need to think deeper: why is this unacceptable for a 17 year old but acceptable for an 18 year old - or a 57 year old?
Age controls are not the real problem.
The "return on investment" with tenured faculty is having accomplished experts who are experienced teachers there to teach the students. It's sort of a basic point about colleges, you'd think the people on a board of trustees would get that.
đ¤Źđ¤Źđ¤Źđ¤Źđ¤Ź
It was a fantastic opportunity to be a panelist for @york.ac.uk Open Research Awards again this year! 𼳠So many amazing projects by students and staff from throughout the university! Check them out via the link below đ
A student who sets out to write a research paper will now encounter chatbots who will offer to do their work in their word document, in their learning management system, in their email, in their web browser, and in certain library database interfaces.
Only a week to our 49th #CALRG conference! Fully online, and free!
All welcome!
www.open.ac.uk/blogs/CALRG/
#CALRG2026 #EdTech
There isnât much left to say except that your children will be less well-rounded than you. Less well-read than you. Less intelligent than you. Less able to problem solve than you. Leas worldly than you. Less empathetic. Less equipped. And more helpless.
For the first time in living history.
FWIW, Iâve got an archive of self-created, self-hosted, open-source, non-extractive, non-surveillant class websites going back 22 years! wordsinspace.net/classes/
Googleâs attempt to use the National Enquirer defense (âweâre inherently untrustworthyâ) fails!
âGoogle argued that users could check the linked sources themselves to verify whether the AI summary was correct. Users generally knew âthat information generated with AI shouldnât be blindly trusted.ââ