//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
Just a thought, what if we used those mythical ballroom contributions to offset the cost of Trump's war? There you go, Donnie, you get a war named for you. Accolades are accolades after all.
We hear a lot about Trump requiring loyalty or about Trump loyalists. Trump confuses loyalty with a willingness to commit crimes in his name. When push comes to shove, their will be no loyalty either to Trump or from Trump.
While my addled brain was idling this morning, maybe because of the news about Philadelphia's 'President's House' controversy and from watching a Washington documentary, I began to wonder why white southerners rail against DEI and yet accepted slaves 'taking their jobs.'
VP Vance made a statement questioning the validity of the LA mayoral race apparently because there won't be a Republican on the ballot. I'm sure other people find this weird or perhaps unacceptable. For one, I am elated that elections are not necessarily between two parties.