(As if this isn't bad enough, a dozen or two mind-numbing pages later he invents "Interrectigradation selection")
2/2
Nostalgia Content
xkcd.com/3256/
Science journalists: how do you handle it when you need to discuss the work of a researcher who is genuinely intellectually significant but also did some Seriously Bad Stuff (e.g. associations with Epstein, known eugenics views, confirmed sexual harassment case, etc.)?