//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
Can you do something besides yap?
Cool, maybe after that’s determined after a recount you can confidentially say it was stolen. As of right now you’re just mimicking Trump sycophants who think the 2020 election was stolen.
Yeah so we have no answers, so you can’t confidently assert that we have an answer as you have.
Maybe don’t tell people their votes don’t matter if you want them to vote.
Literally all this does is further erode trust in our electoral system which disenfranchises even more people from engaging in the political system. You’re literally telling people “your vote doesn’t actually matter”. What do you think is going to be people’s takeaway from that?
3h
28m
31m
3h
32m
In order to disprove something it has to be proven first. This was never proven.
Again, a substack letter is not evidence. That can only be concluded in a court of law, and democrats refused to even attempt to make that argument.
Why do you have to fight those states to demand a recount? If she won shouldn’t they already be doing that?
You gotta prove a claim first. That’s how the burden of proof works.
If it were objectively true, why did Harris concede the election?
3h
3h
32m
30m
3h