//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
I talk about the research on when AI undermines, versus supporting, thinking and learning here: www.oneusefulthing.org/p/choosing-t...
If you're new here, you should be thankful it's much better than it was because of uv :p (Which is basically trying to move Python in the direction of Cargo)
For some time, I used to have dreams that due to a technicality, I never graduated high school and that my PhD would be invalidated unless I went back to high school Billy Madison style. But I kept skipping and consequently wouldn't finish. It has finally relented!
TMLR has the best policies and approach to conventional publishing for AI. But I've long been of the mind that their approach still isn't enough to combat the systemic issues in conventional publishing. Quotas might help short-term, but we ultimately need to radically change our systems.
Just in case there weren't enough reasons for people to consider GLM 5.2 as an alternative.