Issue is not w/ “shared decision-making” in its common usage in medicine—a very good thing!—but rather its specialized meaning in the context of types of vaccine guidance. A shrug rather than an endorsement. That would be clearer if it still went by one of its older names: “permissive use statement”
Jason L. Schwartz
I think you should always listen to Peter Sandman, even if you don't agree. "Shared decision-making on vaccines is not the enemy," one of the great experts on medical decision-making writes in STAT. www.statnews.com/2026/01/26/s...
www.statnews.com
“In its urge to say what Kennedy gets wrong, the public health and medical community is actively resisting something he gets right.”
