Explaining to stdts why phylogeny causes spp to be nonindependent, i talk a lot but feel like it’s just saying the same obvious thing in many different ways—and stdts have no trouble understanding. Is there a nonobvious to explain it? Or is it just somehow both ineffable and intuitive?
Explaining to stdts why phylogeny causes spp to be nonindependent, i talk a lot but feel like it’s just saying the same obvious thing in many different ways—and stdts have no trouble understanding. Is there a nonobvious to explain it? Or is it just somehow both ineffable and intuitive?
Mario de Pinna, undergrad systematics professor who introduced us not only to tree thinking but also to philosophy of science