Gino seems a clear case of a fraudster having been exposed with undeniable evidence.
The effort required to produce that evidence for one person is staggering—likely six or seven figures in time, legal costs & expert labor.
What does that imply about academia’s capacity to expose fraud at scale?
Alexander Wuttke
The forensic report is available here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Incredible stuff
Malte Elson
The testimony of Julian Ackert, the forensic expert in the Gino case, is fascinating for computer nerds. <raises hand>
Whoever changed the metadata might have gotten away with (at least part of) it if they had remembered to include seconds in the timestamp.
