//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...







Loading...
More broadly, and in conversation with Laura Nelson’s recent work, the goal isn’t “unbiased AI.” It’s developing better ways of reasoning under conditions where evidence is mediated, constructed, and otherwise severed from the world.
Breen is right that "we truly have no idea." Also, this sprawling conversation is not limited to the humanities + CS. Sociologists have been very active. See Kozlowski et al. "In Silico Sociology" — and many critiques of "silicon sampling" — and this interesting theoretical piece by Skarpelis:
1mo
1mo
Also, Anna Skarpelis has been writing about this question: bsky.app/profile/akms...
6d
Anna Skarpelis
Ted Underwood
Ted Underwood
📖 New publication out 📖 This piece is a first attempt at articulating why computational social science needs qualitative and historical approaches—especially as we begin to rely more heavily on simulation. sociologica.unibo.it/article/view...
📖 New publication out 📖 This piece is a first attempt at articulating why computational social science needs qualitative and historical approaches—especially as we begin to rely more heavily on simulation. sociologica.unibo.it/article/view...
Interesting take on "historical LLMs" as potential research tool for the humanities. I have been working on a paper for SSHA in November 2026 that will address some of these issues and am curious to follow what people publish in the interim
It’s part of a symposium engaging the one and only Carlo Ginzburg (read The Cheese and the Worms if you haven’t yet 🧀🪱).The core argument: Qualitative and historical work doesn’t just “contextualize” AI,it gives us a toolkit for thinking critically about what counts as knowledge in the first place.
1mo
1mo
Many thanks to Lorenzo Sabetta, @giozzam.bsky.social and @filippobarbera.bsky.social for the invitation. And more to come—a follow-up piece will be presented at SSHA this fall in a panel organized by @profyangzhang.bsky.social and Simeon Newman
1mo
1mo
🔗 Read the article (open access): sociologica.unibo.it/article/view... 🔗 Explore the full issue, with contributions from Peter Bearman, Alix Rule, Lorenzo Sabetta, Mario Cardano, Maurizio Catino, Fabrizio Martire and Vincenzo Mele sociologica.unibo.it/issue/view/1...
1mo
sociologica.unibo.it
View of From Archives to Algorithms: Distance, Evidence, and Inference
sociologica.unibo.it
1mo
View of From Archives to Algorithms: Distance, Evidence, and Inference
Anna Skarpelis
Anna Skarpelis
Anna Skarpelis
Anna Skarpelis
Anna Skarpelis
Anna Skarpelis
📖 New publication out 📖 This piece is a first attempt at articulating why computational social science needs qualitative and historical approaches—especially as we begin to rely more heavily on simulation. sociologica.unibo.it/article/view...
1mo
sociologica.unibo.it
View of From Archives to Algorithms: Distance, Evidence, and Inference
Anna Skarpelis