Inlay

there is a significant number of scholars/scientists who (still) blog. A lot of early semantic web and #openscience discussions happened on this open "platform". Rogue Scholar (@rogue_scholar) is archiving new and old blogs, and just passed the 50 thousand blog posts. All citable by @crossref […]

New article in @pnas.org: We all know ChatGPT loves to delve, bolster, leverage, encompass, showcase, underscore, et cetera. I analyzed full text of 7.3 million journal articles published 2020-2025, hunting for 228 words that spiked after ChatGPT launched in late 2022. 🧵⬇️

Open Access Licences and Open Metadata in Transformative Agreements – Scholarly Communication Analytics https://subugoe.github.io/scholcomm_analytics/posts/ta_coverage_analysis/main.html

Wissenschaft ist nicht unfehlbar. In der sehr guten @artede.bsky.social -Doku “Betrug in der Wissenschaft“ geht es u.a. auch um die Ombudsarbeit. Mit dabei: Prof. Eric Steinhauer und - in einem Rollenspiel - die Rechtsreferentin der Stabi Hamburg, Dr. Ina Kaulen: www.arte.tv/de/videos/12...

The Scholarly Migration Database 2.0 is now online! Just in time for the European Population Conference 2026 in Bologna! See the working paper here: dx.doi.org/10.4054/MPID... @ezagheni.bsky.social @theiletom.bsky.social @mpidr.bsky.social @populationeu.bsky.social

MultiObs Training Sessions 🌎 Attend our weekly meetings on infrastructure & data — subscribe to receive notifications and join live sessions covering research data, bibliometrics and more. 🗓️ Every Tuesday 🔗 multiobs.org/training Past sessions & more info also at multiobs.org/training

Register now to join "The science sleuths: Decoding the findings of the FoSci 2026 Report." #ResearchIntegrity Expert insights into data-driven methods in uncovering research misconduct and manipulation. 🗓️ Thursday 11 June, 3pm BST 10am EDT 🔗 Reserve your spot: https://ow.ly/Y0xn50Z55AW

I analyse Crossref metadata for around 250,000 journal articles published between 2019 and 2025. The analysis reveals that contractual language alone is insufficient to ensure implementation: coverage of specific metadata elements varied considerably across publishers and agreements, and explicit provisions do not consistently translate into higher coverage. A notable near-absence of ROR ID coverage across most agreements highlights gaps that undermine institutional attribution in research assessment and bibliometric analyses, while CC BY licence adoption is highest where agreements mandate it as the sole permissible licence.