//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
Yes you may well be right. He will feel it’s his duty to fight. But if he has little support it will be a horrible way to end his premiership
Yes of course, but if Starmer doesn’t have the confidence of the MPs then he’s toast. I would rather he had a dignified exit rather than be publicly humiliated
Well the current situation isn’t sustainable so something has to be done. It might not fix it, but any improvement for children’s safety and wellbeing is a positive imo
You might actually see an improvement in children’s wellbeing. Which would be a good thing?
What is best for the country? That’s what Starmer should be thinking
Yes. At least they’ll have a bit of peace😁
Is this guy for real?
Unfortunately he has an army of them
Sorry there’s no equivalence here. Children are vulnerable because they have no agency whereas Only Fans ‘creators’ or whatever they call themselves do. They could choose a different way of making money that doesn’t lead to being exploited
Both these posts are woefully missing the point. The ban is a blunt instrument to protect children. You’re both adults and have control over how you interact with social media. Focus on our duty to protect children because the tech companies have failed to make social media as safe place.
3h
4h
4d
4d
4h
9d
2d
9d
4d
3d
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo
Jo