"Artificial Intelligence and the Labor Market"
Nice analysis of LinkedIn data to estimate the impact of AI on jobs between 2010 and 2023.
It illustrates the complexity of AI economic impacts: what exposure taketh away, complementarities and productivity giveth.
www.menakahampole.com
The results are consistent with their hypotheses: AI drives firm growth, occupations with high mean exposure to AI decline but this is often more than offset by complementarities and productivity growth. Big AI impacts with different signs lead to small aggregate changes.
"Artificial Intelligence and the Labor Market"
Nice analysis of LinkedIn data to estimate the impact of AI on jobs between 2010 and 2023.
It illustrates the complexity of AI economic impacts: what exposure taketh away, complementarities and productivity giveth.
www.menakahampole.com
All this highlights the need to consider AI economic impacts holistically, and to create incentives and infrastructure to reproduce AI economic impact analyses regularly to track longer term impacts via improved capabilities and job redesign.
They use LinkedIn job ads to measure firm-level AI adoption and occupation / task distribution, and embedding distance to ONET tasks to quantify exposure. They use instruments to reduce selection biases and mitigate mis-measurement (read the paper for full details)
In their model, AI displaces an occupation if its mean task exposure to AI is high, and augments it if its exposure dispersion is high (some tasks are exposed to AI and others untouched). They also consider impacts on labour demand though AI-powered firm growth.
Metascience and AI postdoctoral fellowship
Cool @sloanfoundation.bsky.social opportunity for anyone interested in studying AI x science adoption and impact. It is also very aligned with the evidence and experimentation recommendation in our recent essay!
sloan.org/programs/dig...
Intl Conf on the Science of Science & Innovation abstracts open! ššš
š¢ š”š²š š½š®š½š²šæ alert! We document how šš²š»š²šæš®šš¶šš² šš š¶š šæš²ššµš®š½š¶š»š“ š±š²šŗš®š»š± š³š¼šæ š³šæš²š²š¹š®š»š°š²šæ ššøš¶š¹š¹š. š¼ š»
š We analysed šÆš + š·š¼šÆ š½š¼ššš, used embeddings to cluster them into šš¬š¬+ š³š¶š»š²-š“šæš®š¶š»š²š± ššøš¶š¹š¹š, and LLMs to classify them as sššÆššš¶šššš®šÆš¹š², š°š¼šŗš½š¹š²šŗš²š»šš®šæš, or šš»š®š³š³š²š°šš²š±.