//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
True in some cases, where I think copyright is or can be good policy. But not true in many cases, where copyright creates market failures, rather than solving them.
Cool, what’s the premise?
5d
5d
Brian L. Frye
Brian L. Frye
The metaphysics of the law are hard.🤷‍♂️
5d
Yes, but they also have an incentive to target similar but non-confusing products, in order to prevent competition, thereby harming consumers.
5d
I think it actually does a fair amount of work! But it’s unfortunately unreliable in the edge cases where it’s most visible.
5d
But other than that, how was the play?
Lessig.
Brian L. Frye
5d
They both are. But the first is clunkier.
When it comes to public goods, free riding is statically efficient, but might be dynamically inefficient.
May the rest of your day be better!
Brian L. Frye
5d
5d
5d
5d