My new PLOS Bio piece about when one's work is misrepresented: "[T]here is a normative expectation within scholarly research that all parties are well-intentioned and truth-seeking...when invitations to engage genuinely are not accepted..scholarly discourse is ill-equipped to resolve the conflict."
10 years since CRediT was introduced, >20% adoption (of full text in Dimensions). Now, we need to build on this to comprehensively integrate CRediT in metadata and make sure the taxonomy evolves to remain fit for purpose. doi.org/10.1038/d415...
W/ @sjcporter.bsky.social Liz Allen Ruth Whitman
Building on a recent publication in @pnas.org (plos.io/4saRwae), @verokiermer.bsky.social, @magdalenaskipper.bsky.social and
@kbibbinsdomingo.bsky.social call for action on adopting a principle-based approach for a responsible authorship culture
🧪 #AcademicSky @plos.org @jama.com
plos.io/3Pr5ZAu
Latest research with @plos.org colleagues to understand how we can help focus on intrinsic qualities in research assessment.
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees
peerj.com/articles/205...
@peerj.bsky.social @iainhz.bsky.social
A great opportunity for researchers to contribute to a great organization, and to how they want their work surfaced in all contexts where it matters! If you are thinking about applying, apply!!
Authorship decisions should be anchored in the inseparable principles of credit, accountability and transparency.
Credit entails accountability and accountability entails credit. Transparency is required because authorship practices must evolve with research practices. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
The layoffs jeopardize this resource, which has served more than 4,000 labs for about three decades.
www.thetransmitter.org
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
"We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals ... & found [them] highly variable. We propose ... a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability." @verokiermer.bsky.social et al on authorship culture www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
In this Formal Comment, representatives from PLOS, Nature and JAMA call for action on adopting a principle-based approach for a responsible authorship culture
Researchers who serve on grant review and hiring committees have to make decisions about the intrinsic value of research in short periods of time, and research impact metrics such Journal Impact Facto...
In a thought-provoking @plosbiology.org Perspective article,
@briannosek.bsky.social asks whether science’s openness can be used against it, looking at how transparency and self-skepticism might be reframed in today’s discourse around golden standards
plos.io/4l8rNuE
#OpenScience 🧪
Information about the roles of each author of a paper can help to build trust, integrity and responsible research assessment. Coordinated efforts are needed to consolidate progress.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
New on the blog! In an interview with Veronique Kiermer @verokiermer.bsky.social, Chief Scientific Officer for @plos.org, she provides insight into their approach to data sharing, visibility and evaluation.
👉 Read the post: makedatacount.org/read-our-blo...
#dataevaluation #datasharing
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
