//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
A great opportunity for researchers to contribute to a great organization, and to how they want their work surfaced in all contexts where it matters! If you are thinking about applying, apply!!
Authorship decisions should be anchored in the inseparable principles of credit, accountability and transparency. Credit entails accountability and accountability entails credit. Transparency is required because authorship practices must evolve with research practices. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
10 years since CRediT was introduced, >20% adoption (of full text in Dimensions). Now, we need to build on this to comprehensively integrate CRediT in metadata and make sure the taxonomy evolves to remain fit for purpose. doi.org/10.1038/d415... W/ @sjcporter.bsky.social Liz Allen Ruth Whitman
Latest research with @plos.org colleagues to understand how we can help focus on intrinsic qualities in research assessment. A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees peerj.com/articles/205... @peerj.bsky.social @iainhz.bsky.social
10d
3mo
4mo
6mo
Information about the roles of each author of a paper can help to build trust, integrity and responsible research assessment. Coordinated efforts are needed to consolidate progress.
doi.org
A ten-year drive to credit authors for their work — and why there’s still more to do
Veronique Kiermer
Veronique Kiermer
Veronique Kiermer
Veronique Kiermer
Building on a recent publication in @pnas.org (plos.io/4saRwae), @verokiermer.bsky.social, @magdalenaskipper.bsky.social and @kbibbinsdomingo.bsky.social call for action on adopting a principle-based approach for a responsible authorship culture 🧪 #AcademicSky @plos.org @jama.com plos.io/3Pr5ZAu
In a thought-provoking @plosbiology.org Perspective article, @briannosek.bsky.social asks whether science’s openness can be used against it, looking at how transparency and self-skepticism might be reframed in today’s discourse around golden standards plos.io/4l8rNuE #OpenScience 🧪
2mo
www.thetransmitter.org/community/ha...
10mo
My new PLOS Bio piece about when one's work is misrepresented: "[T]here is a normative expectation within scholarly research that all parties are well-intentioned and truth-seeking...when invitations to engage genuinely are not accepted..scholarly discourse is ill-equipped to resolve the conflict."
"We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals ... & found [them] highly variable. We propose ... a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability." @verokiermer.bsky.social et al on authorship culture www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
10mo
10mo
2mo
PLOS Medicine
Nonia Pariente
ā­ļø Nominations now open for ORCID Board: šŸ‘‰ https://info.orcid.org/nominations-now-open-for-orcid-board-elections-2027/ & ā­ļø ORCID's Researcher Advisory Council: šŸ‘‰ https://info.orcid.org/calling-all-researchers-orcid-researcher-advisory-council-nominations-now-open/ šŸ“… Nominations due 26 June!
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
PNAS
doi.org
10d
Academic Publishing News
Researchers who serve on grant review and hiring committees have to make decisions about the intrinsic value of research in short periods of time, and research impact metrics such Journal Impact Facto...
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees
peerj.com
Perrimon Lab
New on the blog! In an interview with Veronique Kiermer @verokiermer.bsky.social, Chief Scientific Officer for @plos.org, she provides insight into their approach to data sharing, visibility and evaluation. šŸ‘‰ Read the post: makedatacount.org/read-our-blo... #dataevaluation #datasharing
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
journals.plos.org
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself
Brian Nosek
The layoffs jeopardize this resource, which has served more than 4,000 labs for about three decades.
www.thetransmitter.org
Exclusive: Harvard University lays off fly database team
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
plos.io
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself
A responsible authorship culture is needed and it is a collective responsibility
In this Formal Comment, representatives from PLOS, Nature and JAMA call for action on adopting a principle-based approach for a responsible authorship culture
plos.io
6mo
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
www.pnas.org
ORCID
PNAS
Make Data Count