//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
We've reached the point where you don't even need to "stop" it. You can go back to allowing solar and wind development that the market will favor because it's now substantially cheaper than any other form of energy. Reframe the problem as Republicans hampering renewables as a source of cheap energy.
“The real surprise from the OECD’s subsidy numbers is that it cost China less than $18bn in sectoral support over 15 years to build an industry that can now provide more clean power than the world can readily absorb.” www.ft.com/content/b6ca...
NEW – Analysis: Solar overtakes gas power in Asia for first time ever | Ho Woo Nam @joshgabbatiss.bsky.social Read here: buff.ly/vycGh25
4d
9d
4d
Clean power is within our reach — yet factories sit idle
www.ft.com
Wasting China’s solar panel surplus is madness
depressing how explicit they are about it. makes you nostalgic for the days of greenwashing, when at least it was seen as important to *pretend* to care
Wolfgang Blau
Carbon Brief
Alejandra Caraballo
7d