//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfileReplies









Loading...
I finished "The Brain, In Theory" by @romainbrette.bsky.social It was an amazing read, and now I'm questioning all my beliefs
Well if "the brain is a computer" simply means that people can calculate, I think that's rather misleading.
No, you can't say anything about a required number of operations if you don't specify anything about the operations. Complexity theory starts from a model of computation, in which, invariably, there is a finite set of basic operations that are combined.
Maybe because the terminology is incredibly misleading? The whole point of representation is that behavioral invariance is thanks to symbols in the brain, ie, reliable proxies. What the experiments show is precisely that system invariance is not due to component invariance (=symbols).
So I claim that the brain is a real estate agent. Learn from it!
Of course *some* of what we do is computation, like when we calculate. Computation is a specific kind of human behavior that we try to automate in computers. It doesn't follow that the brain is a computer, or that cognition in general is computation.
Useful if the claim is true, that is.