//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
I think in all likelihood the colonizers will split into seven ideological factions en route and will need seven different landing sites when they arrive… and who knows what happens after that…
I'm just going to say it, I really don't like the "how do we make OSS sustainable" framing. OSS is already sustainable. The only thing not sustainable is users expecting a free lunch (support, LTS, bug fixes, ...). As a user, you are responsible for your OSS usage. Fork/patch if you need to.
2mo
1mo
minds can definitely exist within other, larger minds
AI data centers are literally sucking the oxygen out of the air, causing people up to several miles away to be short of breath and suffer from extreme headaches
permissionless innovation includes people doing things you won’t like or judge as slop
how much does this service cost and where do i sign up
hitting Stalin with the “You’re absolutely right!”
29d
2mo
1mo
1mo
2mo
not to backseat drive nasa too much but i don’t think they should allow comms blackouts for crewed missions
James
Carl Lerche
2mo
2mo
henry
henry
henry
henry
henry
henry
norvid_studies
The China brain problem is a special case of the more general problem whether minds could exist within other, larger minds.[7]
3mo