//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts









Loading...
This paper would not have been possible without the collaboration and guidance of @mjakesch.bsky.social, @mariannealq.bsky.social and @informor.bsky.social. The paper is now available in open access! #chi2026 dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...
2mo
dl.acm.org
Reactive Writers: How Co-Writing with AI Changes How We Engage with Ideas | Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
2mo
We analyzed 1,291 co-writing sessions and interviewed 19 participants who wrote an opinion text on a controversial topic. Some wrote with an AI assistant supportive of a position, some with an AI whose suggestions leaned critical, and some wrote on their own, without AI assistance.
2mo
Writers with a Positive AI ended up writing about different topics than writers with a Critical AI, and both wrote on a narrower range of topics than writers working alone.
2mo