Some very interesting discussion, reposted from X, about standards of accuracy in some research areas -- those who follow/read Slobodian might be interested.
My take is that the intellectual hygiene in some areas is terrible, and there is very limited interest in any self-correction.
It seems this news hasn't reached this platform yet, but Phil Magness has some striking notes on how @quinnslobodian.com quotes sources, which I'll simply reproduce here
1/
