//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
ProfilePosts








Loading...
Just published my review of neuroscience in 2025, on The Spike. The 10th of these, would you believe? This year we have foundation models, breakthroughs in using light to understand the brain, a gene therapy, and more Enjoy! medium.com/the-spike/20...
Stand Up For Science, SF! #standupforscience
I hope all interested in science are paying attention: Trump and Vought are bypassing the strong bipartisan support for biomedical science and halting funding thought administrative delays. Call Congress if you want to save American science 🧪
Just added this to my WordPress site, so it's free to read. homunculusmusic.wordpress.com/2026/02/14/e...
This recent RCT of an "AI stethoscope" claims the technology "shows promise" for diagnosing cardiovascular conditions. It does not. It is a textbook example of the risks of conducting unprincipled 'per protocol analyses'. Once again, peer review at a major medical journal has failed. 🧵 1/
Once again, @dereklowe.bsky.social is not holding back and I am here for it. www.science.org/content/blog... 1/2
5mo
3mo
1mo
4mo
3mo
🚨 New from me: Grant review at more than half of NIH's institutes could be frozen by the end of the year. That's because crucial NIH grant-review panels are slated to be empty at those institutes by Jan 2027. A wonky bureaucratic problem with big implications. A short 🧵
The most impt change at #NIH and to US science this year is bigger than grant cancellations— it’s how the agency is governed. For 75 years NIH has been largely independent of presidential control. That’s changed this year. New piece from me and @nataliebaviles.bsky.social in @nature.com 🧪
25d
5mo
3mo
Science story about today’s Bethesda Declaration report. www.science.org/content/arti...
Mark D Humphries
Ethan Solomon
Mark Peifer (He, him)
Philip Ball
13d
Peter Tennant
Mark Histed
Max Kozlov
2025: A Review of the Year in Neuroscience
Enlightening the brain
medium.com
As with Peter Mandelson, so in the science world: the Epstein files are not telling us anything that most ordinary punters didn’t already know, but are revealing the full, rotten, appalling extent …
homunculusmusic.wordpress.com
Epstein’s ugly world of science
www.science.org
Follow-up report by current and former agency employees describes ongoing science censorship by political appointees and “culture of fear”
Thirteen of the agency’s advisory councils, which must review grant applications before funding is awarded, are on track to have no voting members.www.nature.com
NIH’s destruction continues, Bethesda Declaration signers say
Exclusive: key NIH review panels due to lose all members by the end of 2026
How Congress can restore the independence of US science
Members must go beyond reinstating US government research spending and re-establish decentralized governance at the National Institutes of Health and other agencies.
www.nature.com
The NIH has been holding back grants from funds Congress has already approved. www.wsj.com/opinion/get-...
1mo
AI-enabled stethoscopes show promise for improving diagnosis of cardiovascular conditions, UK trial finds. Explore the research: spkl.io/63326AsjJ8
3mo
The Lancet
Denis Wirtz
The NIH has been holding back grants from funds Congress has already approved.
www.wsj.com
Opinion | Get the Federal Science Money Flowing
www.science.org
The Current Crisis: What's Happening to Science in America
Jeremy Berg
Jeremy Berg