//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
William H. Neukom Professor, Stanford Law School. Partner, Lex Lumina LLP. I teach and write in IP, antitrust, internet, and video game law
Mark Lemley









Loading...
My first reaction to this was DUH, but then I put on my nicer person hat because I’m glad this research exists to back up the obvious anecdotal observation that we live in an age of monopolies, some in fact and some, as with those sharing board directors, in practice.
News on my study with Lane Miles and @vanloo.bsky.social law.stanford.edu/press/award-...
8d
9d
Directors are serving on the boards of competing companies far more often than previously understood, according to a new antitrust study by Mark Lemle
law.stanford.edu
Award-Winning Antitrust Study Finds Competitors Share Directors Far More Often Than Previously Known | Stanford Law School
I don't understand what's remotely inconsistent between a statute creating 18-year terms and a requirement that Congress not eliminate the SCOTUS altogether.
Mark Lemley