//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
This enrtire narrative is HILARIOUSLY undercut by the joint 26(f) filing between Patagonia and Pattie Gonia on Jun 1 which Turnip seems to have not read before updating their post on June 6. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.1003309/gov.uscourts.cacd.1003309.24.0.pdf
15h
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5, filed by Plaintiff Patagonia, Inc... (Gilchrist, Gregory) (Entered: 06/01/2026)
storage.courtlistener.com
Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan – #24 in Patagonia, Inc. v. Entrepreneur Enterprises, Inc. (C.D. Cal., 2:26-cv-00586) – CourtListener.com
Dan Izzo
Patagonia’s lawsuit against Pattie Gonia is no longer just a trademark dispute. It is a test of whether a company built on environmental credibility can recognize queer climate advocacy as an ally — or only as a brand threat. Guuurl. Your slip is showing. buff.ly/iX5SNDh #Patagonia #PattieGonia
3d
Patagonia’s lawsuit against Pattie Gonia may protect a trademark, but the real damage is reputational: a company missing the chance to support queer climate advocacy.
buff.ly
Patagonia Saw an Ally and Called a Lawyer
TURNIP STYLE