//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Exploring the intersection of culture, evolution, psychology and anthropology. We study how culture and evolution shape human behaviour and society
Centre for Culture and Evolution









Loading...
If you’re joining online, Teams details are: Meeting ID 345 112 979 649 81 Passcode DE3h4Xt3 See you there! 🤩
4/ The talk is hosted by @rebeccasear.bsky.social , Director of Brunel CCE, whose recent public work has focused on eugenics, scientific racism and how academia responds to these issues
3/ Celso’s talk looks at ancestry estimation in human genetics: useful for evolutionary history and medicine, but controversial because ancestry categories can echo older racial divisions and oversimplify human relatedness
5/ Open to all! Come along in-person or online if you’re interested in genetics, race, ethics, classification, scientific practice, or how apparently technical choices become very real social problems And if you come in person, there will be refreshments. Obviously important.
2/ The question sounds niche. It is not. When scientists choose categories, models or labels, are those choices ever “just methods”? Or can they carry ethical consequences too? Science does not get an ethics-free backstage pass